My Talk (link to video here) at the American Society of Bariatric Physician's Obesty & Associated Disease Symposium. It was given to a group of doctors, many of which treat their obese patients with a very low calorie diet. It is 15 minutes long, followed by 2 minutes of Q & A. For more on the conference, go here.
My Talk (link to video here) at the American Society of Bariatric Physician's Obesty & Associated Disease Symposium. It was given to a group of doctors, many of which treat their obese patients with a very low calorie diet. It is 15 minutes long, followed by 2 minutes of Q & A. For more on the conference, go here.
0 Comments
In 1944, Ancel Keys recruited 36 men into what would be known as the Minnesota Starvation Experiment, to study the physiological and psychological effects of prolonged and severe dietary restriction. He detailed his findings in a 1400 page, two volume book entitled The Biology of Human Starvation. These men volunteered to starve themselves and suffer for the altruistic goal of contributing to science and improving our understand of the detrimental effects a lack of food may have on human health. Shortly after the start of the experiment, the men quickly how realized how difficult it may be to take part in this study, as the predictable signs and symptoms crept in: constant hunger, decreased body temperature, lack of libido, and a total inability to think of anything but food. A large part of their mental energy - even in their dreams as they slept - was inexorably devoted to food and hunger. There was self-mutilation, depression, anxiety, and in one man, a desire to be infected by tuberculosis simply for the opportunity to be fed and satiated once again in the hospital. One man in particular, offered a chilling expose of what it was like to live on such little food: "How does it feel to starve? It is something like this: I'm hungry. I'm always hungry - not like the hunger that comes when you miss lunch but a continual cry from the body for food. At times I can almost forget about it but there is nothing that can hold my interest for long. I wait for mealtime. When it comes I eat slowly and make the food last as long as possible. The menu never gets monotonous even if it is the same each day or is of poor quality. It is food and all food tastes good. Even dirty crusts of bread in the street look appetizing and I envy the fat pigeons picking at them. No food is wasted and the sight of people wasting it in restaurants is intolerable. ...I'm weak. I can walk miles at my own pace in order to satisfy laboratory requirements but often I trip on cracks in the sidewalk....This lack of strength is a great frustration. In fact it is often a greater frustration than the hunger. I eagerly look forward to the day when I can go upstairs two at a time or maybe run to catch a streetcar. ...Social graces, interests, spontaneous activity and responsibility take second place to concerns of food. I lick my plate unashamedly at each meal even when guests are present. I don't sit near guests, for then it is necessary to entertain and talk with them. That takes too much energy and destroys some of the enjoyment that comes from my food. I no longer have that ardent desire to help millions of starving people; rather I feel akin to them and hope that I as well as they will benefit from scientific refeeding." So what were they eating?
“The major food items served were whole wheat bread, potatoes, cereals, and considerable amounts of turnips and cabbage. Only token amounts of meats and dairy products were provided." But what is most striking is how much food they were given to eat: 1570 calories per day. 1570 calories a day, which is 130 calories more than the globally recommended caloric intake for a 5'3", 200 pound sedentary female with a BMI of 35.5 told to lose 1 pound per week, according to the widely accepted Mifflin-ST Jeor equation. How did the caloric intake of a “starvation diet” almost 70 years ago become the standard of care today? Reading through the Biology of Human Starvation, the similarities from the Minnesota Starvation Experiment and the stories from those that have registered for AWLR are just incredible. Many of those who have registered, detailed what it was like to eat a low fat, low calorie diet before they began their new way of eating. Body Temperature As one subject described in 1944: "I’m cold. In July I walk downtown on a sunny day with a shirt and sweater to keep me warm. At night my well fed room mate, who isn’t in the experiment, sleeps on top of his sheets but I crawl under two blankets.” And from AWLR: “I was cold even in the Florida summer, I could see all the veins in my hand, and I almost passed out during a training session at the gym.” “I was hungry all the time; I obsessed about food to the point that I planned every meal for several days in advance. I felt cold much of the time, especially at night.” Skin As Ancel Keys explained: “At 23 weeks…19 of the 31 subjects had developed brownish patchy pigmentation of the skin" and "[a] dry and scaly skin…was reported for 15 of the 31 subjects during the twenty-third week of semi-starvation." From AWLR: "AND, MY SKIN has improved 300%. I used to have some brown skin tags on my face and shoulder and a large one on my scalp. Low carb diet has made them FALL off, effortlessly.” "Even the rough skin on the heels of my feet smoothed away!" -- People are universally hungry on a low calorie diet. We need to start listening to the people consuming these diets, and how it makes them feel, instead of blaming the patient and blindly citing the USDA’s dietary guidelines, which is molded by vicious lobbying interests and political partisanship. The food industry has a direct and powerful influence on the USDA and the dietary guidelines. If you don't believe this, read Dr. Nestle's Food Politics. If you don’t believe her, you can look at what happened when the USDA recently decided to begin an interoffice “Meatless Mondays” as a way of reducing their environmental impact. What followed was an outraged president of the National Cattleman’s Beef Association condemning this idea. In response, the USDA retreated with its tail between its legs. And why does the United States Department of Agriculture, whose mission is to “keep America’s farmers and ranchers in business,” have any say in what we are supposed to be eating? Can someone say conflict of interest? Despite all this, in the end we can only hope that the truth will prevail. As people register from all over the world and cast their vote for or against the potential benefits of removing grain, wheat, and sugar from their diet, the real effects (at least according to our self reported data) will slowly reveal themselves. -- Tried a paleo or low carb diet? Join Today and contribute to a better understanding of this way of eating! View our Marketplace of paleo and low carb experts that compete against eachother to help you lose weight and get healthy! According to the USDA, we should be consuming no more than 300 mg of cholesterol per day to reduce our risk of cardiovascular disease. The idea being that, in some people, high serum cholesterol is associated with heart disease, so reducing our dietary cholesterol may help to keep our blood cholesterol low. This hypothesis, overly abundant in the medical and nutrition communities, has much contradictory evidence. This low cholesterol recommendation is also nearly impossible to comply with for the average carnivore. According to PhotoCalorie, just 6 ounces of steak or 1.5 eggs already exceeds your limit for the entire day. The idea that dietary cholesterol increases blood cholesterol seems logical, however the evidence supporting this hypothesis is not strong. This has been known since as early as 1953. Dr. Ancel Keys was one of the first researchers to test this hypothesis, feeding subjects extremely high levels of dietary cholesterol and measuring their blood response. He found almost no effects, despite the absurd amounts of dietary cholesterol administered. Upon further research, Keys accepted that there is some relationship, and created a formula to predict it: blood cholesterol is proportional to the square root of the amount of dietary cholesterol added. Change in serum cholesterol between 2 diets = 1.5*(Z2 – Z1), where Z is the square root of the cholesterol content of each diet in mg/1000 kcal According to Keys’ equation above, if someone consuming a 2,000 calorie diet and 1200mg of cholesterol (4x the recommended level) per day reduced their total dietary cholesterol by 6-fold to 200 mg a day, their serum cholesterol would drop by 21.75 mg/dl. Going from 300 mg per 1000 calories eaten to 150 mg per 1000 calories eaten would drop serum cholesterol by a mere 3.75 mg. This is due to the liver's unique ability to sense dietary cholesterol, and modulate subsequent cholesterol production. During the same time, other researchers believed there was a larger relationship. When they fed subjects cholesterol combined with egg yolk, their blood cholesterol increased. When they consumed much higher doses of pure cholesterol, the blood response was less pronounced. Possible explanations for this were increased bioavailability of the cholesterol when mixed with egg yolk, or the possibility that another ingredient besides the yolk’s cholesterol was increasing blood cholesterol levels. However, the amount of egg yolk required to make a significant difference is usually quite large. Other researchers have since confirmed Ancel Keys’ square root relationship, adding that dietary cholesterol has greatest effects on serum cholesterol if it is added to a low cholesterol, or cholesterol-free diet. At moderate cholesterol intakes, serum cholesterol changed very little with added cholesterol. A 1997 meta-analysis compiled 9 predictive equations since 1990, calculating that for a 2500 kcal diet, a 1.37-2.68 mg/dl decrease in serum cholesterol could be expected for every 100 mg/day decrease in dietary cholesterol. The prediction based on their meta-analysis was a 2.2 mg/dl decrease in serum cholesterol for every 100 mg/day decrease in dietary cholesterol. Encouraging the masses to eat a low cholesterol diet does not seem to have any significant effect on decreasing serum cholesterol levels. It also encourages low-protein diets, which are less effective for weight loss and satiety. For more on this, and a list of sources, see our dietary cholesterol page in the related science section. -- Tried a carb-restricted or paleo diet? Join the registry today! |
Subscribe and Receive our Updates
Archives
June 2020
Categories
All
|